Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Editor in Chief
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Tablet
    None
    Posts
    722
    Liked
    142 times

    South Korean Court: Apple v Samsung; Both Parties Infringed; Samsung Didn't Copy


    With all of the media focus on the U.S. trial of Apple vs. Samsung, it's easy to lose track of the other cases going on around the world between the two juggernauts. The South Korean case just wrapped up and the court ruled that Samsung did not "slavishly copy" Apple's designs. Both sides were found to be infringing upon each other's patents though. Here's a breakdown of the results:

    Samsung’s products infringed Apple’s ‘bounce-back’ patent -
    • Samsung's Galaxy S, Galaxy S II, Galaxy Nexus, Galaxy Tab and the Galaxy Tab 10.1 have been banned from South Korea.
    • Samsung will have to pay 25 Million won in damages (which amounts to about $22,000 Dollars.)

    Apple's products infringed two of Samsung's patents related to wireless transmission of data -
    • Apple's iPhone 4 and iPad 2 have been banned from South Korea
    • Apple will have to pay 40 Million won in damages (which amounts to about $35,000 dollars.)

    As far as Apple's "trade dress" arguments are concerned, (that's the accusation of copying), here was the South Korean judge's statement,

    There are lots of external design similarities between the iPhone and Galaxy S, such as rounded corners and large screens … but these similarities had been documented in previous products,” a judge at the Seoul Central District Court said on Friday.
    The court also stated that there was "no possibility" of confusion between Apple and Samsung products for consumers.

    Obviously, both parties are likely to appeal these decisions, but at least we are seeing some progress. The case was mostly a "wash" for both parties. Now, if we could just get the U.S. judge and jury to pay attention to the South Korean case, maybe some fair and equitable result can be attained in the U.S. as well.

    Source: AndroidPolice

  2. #2
    Jazz
    Member #
    30912
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Tablet
    TF101
    Posts
    43
    Liked
    8 times
    Here's the thing that bugs me about Apple's claims. One of the claims was that people were "confused", I guess meaning that some idiot bought a Samsung phone thinking it was an iPhone. Look at the image at the top of this article. You see an iPhone on the left, a Samsung device on the right which has similar design characteristics, and 3rd device in the middle. Now look at the Samsung device. How do you know it's a Samsung?
    BECAUSE IT BLOODY SAYS SAMSUNG RIGHT ON THE FACE OF IT!!!!!

 

 

Remove Ads

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-17-2012, 02:18 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-31-2012, 11:12 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-19-2012, 03:31 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-25-2011, 12:41 PM

Search tags for this page

samsung 25 milion dolar for apple korea

,

samsung korean

Click on a term to search for related topics.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3
Copyright © 2019 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 PM.